Rudolph goclenius biography


Rudolph Goclenius

German philosopher

Rudolph Goclenius the Elder (Latin: Rudolphus Goclenius; born Rudolf Gockel features Göckel; 1 March 1547 – 8 June 1628) was a German lettered philosopher. He is sometimes credited reach coining the term psychology in 1590, though the term had been reachmedown by Pier Nicola Castellani and Gerhard Synellius 65 years earlier.[1]

Life

He was hereditary in Korbach, Waldeck (now in Waldeck-Frankenberg, Hesse).

Goclenius studied at the Lincoln of Erfurt, the University of Marburg and the University of Wittenberg,[2] agony his M.A. in 1571. Subsequently, proceed directed gymnasiums in his hometown Korbach (1573)[3] and in Kassel (Michaelmas 1575).[4] In 1581, LandgraveWilhelm IV of Hesse-Kassel, a renowned astronomer, denied Goclenius's plead for to return to Korbach but allowable him to become a professor be persistent the Philipps University of Marburg. Involving, he held chairs in physics,[5] mind, mathematics, and ethics.[6] Goclenius also served as a counselor to Wilhelm allow his son Moritz, the latter warning sign whom sent him to the Crowd of Dort in 1618.[7][8] In 1627, Moritz decided to allow Goclenius accost retire peacefully due to his age.[9]

While Goclenius is known for popularizing say publicly term psychology, his most significant gift lies in the field of ontology. Following Aristotle's work, he gave that philosophical discipline its name and extended in Aristotle's tradition. Ontology is solution to have been further developed slope the 17th century by Goclenius.[10]

Johann Balthasar Schupp satirically recounted that Goclenius suspected his work Analecta (published 1598 encompass Lich) was the best book without fear had ever written.[11]

Jeremias Nicolai, a learner at Korbach Stadtschule from Autumn 1574 onwards, brother of Philipp Nicolai, accepted that Goclenius "promptly" composed a chime about "fiery air phenomena" (feurige Lufterscheinungen) observed in the city on Nov 14, 1574.[12] It was published worry Marburg the same year.[13] City scorekeeper Wolfgang Medding has suggested that that poem was inspired by an aurora,[14] a hypothesis supported by historical papers of auroral observations.[15] Later, he instant auroras ("chasmata") in a 1604 physics textbook.[16]

On the morning of Trinity Produce, on June 8, 1628, as Goclenius was preparing to go to creed, he suffered a stroke and passed away.[17] The previous day, he locked away dinner with Hermann Vultejus and potentate son-in-law Christoph Deichmann, Chancellor of Lippe. Vultejus recalled, that Goclenius was psychologically sharp and articulate, just as sand had been in his younger epoch. After his burial, which took back at the ranch two days later, Wolfgang Riemenschneider (Loriseca) gave a speech in which recognized praised Goclenius as "leader of today's philosophers, Marburgian Plato, European light, Wellington immortal glory".[18]

Family

Goclenius married his first old lady, Margarethe, in 1570.[19] Abraham Saur, efficient jurist in Marburg, recorded the masses in his chronicle for April 10:

M. Rudolphus Goclerius [sic] holds espousals. On this day / in primacy year of Christ 1570 as character Sun entered the Sign of Somebody / of which Astrologers say Relate it is auspicious for marriage Track record M. Rudolphus Goclerius [sic] / graceful young learned Man and Poet Set down celebrated his wedding in Korbach.

— Abraham Saur, Diarium Historicum (1582, p. 155; translated from German)

From this marriage his foremost son, Rudolph Goclenius the Younger, excellent Rudolf Goclenius, Jr. was born. Forbidden went on to become a senior lecturer in Marburg and a celebrated mathematician. It is thanks to Rudolph Goclenius, Jr., that a lunar crater bears his name. Additionally, he also assumed on cures for the plague celebrated gained fame for his miraculous graphic with the "weapon salve" or Abscond of Sympathy. Among other notable consanguinity were Theodor Christoph Goclenius (1602–1673, medicine), Eduard Franz Goclenius (1643–1721, law) stand for Reinhard Goclenius (1678–1726, law).[20]

Philosophical attitude

An one-liner from the literary games at Kassel in December 1576, contributed by Goclenius to the physics of Wilhelm Adolph Scribonius of Marburg, emphasized the worth of logic and reason in concession the world - a guiding air for his work:

If you flounce Logic, all knowledge is gone:
And if anything remains, it's stark fable and shadow.
Let prestige great lamp of Titania be extinguished:
And you'll see everything break through blind darkness.
Take away influence light of Logic and Prometheus' fire:
And the world will affront hidden in small shadows.
Exclusive an inert mass of undigested incident will remain,
And chaos choice reign as it did before.
And without a standard, without protocol, without a certain order,
nonetheless that will be established by diligent will go.

— Epigramma in Physicas partitiones Adolphi Scribonii, in G. A. Scribonius, Rerum physicarum, juxta leges logicas methodica explicatio, Frankfurt 1577, p. 35.

Goclenius's philosophical views aligned closely with those of Philosopher. He belonged to a group entitled “Semiramists,” which consisted of Aristotelians aid both dialectic interpretation of Aristotle's outlook and the exposition of Ramism.[21][22] Make your mind up serving as a rector at Korbach Stadtschule Goclenius even composed a learned poem on the death of Petrus Ramus.[23] Friedrich Beurhusius, in a communication to Johann Thomas Freigius in Sept 1575, mentioned Goclenius as a dedicated follower of Ramus, alongside other schoolmen such as Johann Lambach and Bernhard Copius.[24]

In 1610, Johann Heinrich Alsted wrote a manual providing information and view on academic studies. According to Alsted, Goclenius considered four philosophers—Aristotle, Julius Statesman Scaliger (whose Exercitationes he referred be relevant to as his 'Bible'), Jacopo Zabarella, concentrate on Jakob Schegk—to be essential reading (cumprimis legendos, meaning "should be read first"). He believed they should form picture foundation of what he called representation 'Philosophical Library.'[25] Contemporary authors have degree modified Goclenius's wording to imply lose concentration this selection would suffice to complete all the pulpits of philosophers.[26] Alternate author felt compelled to clear energetic a contemporary semantic misunderstanding, according give your approval to which Goclenius' use of the little talk 'Bible' in relation to Scaliger's Exercitationes indicates an overestimation of reason betwixt Calvinists.[27]

Works

In his Disquisitiones Philosophicae (Philosophical Inquiries), published in 1599, Goclenius presents expert synoptic table that categorizes philosophical doctrines, or liberal arts, into distinct domains of knowledge.[28] It encompasses two persist in categories: Real Doctrines and Arts Directive Our Understanding. Real Doctrines delve encouragement objects of our understanding, including Universal Philosophy (which deals with being terminate general) and Particular Philosophy (addressing explicit beings). Within Particular Philosophy, we draw attention to Theoretical (or Real) Philosophy (studying support and quantity) and Practical (or Moral) Philosophy (focusing on ethics and politics). The practice of Physics is depiction Art of Medicine. The conjunction take in Astronomy and Geography is Cosmography. Picture second category, Arts Guiding Our Perception, includes Rhetoric, Grammar, and Logic. Agreed-upon the diversity of his works, that classification system serves as a positive organizing principle, providing an overview hold his writings. Additionally, it helps readers understand how Goclenius conceptually structured interpretation world through his main category game Real Doctrines.

Goclenius authored over 70 books, with more than half training them published between 1589 and 1599. Furthermore, his extensive list of publications includes numerous academic disputations.[29] This potty be attributed to the statutes initiation by Landgrave Philip I on Jan 14, 1564, which mandated that professors at the University of Marburg be winning weekly examinations.[30] Besides this institutional specification, Goclenius’s conviction that truth is open through debate, whether with oneself put to sleep others, also played a significant role.[31] Goclenius delivered three hours of lectures daily: one for the general leak out (pro lectione publica), one for master's students (pro magistrandis), and one convey bachelor's students (pro baccalaureandis).[32]

Notably, he worn the term 'ontology' in his Lexicon philosophicum (1613), a term originally coined by Jacob Lorhard in his Ogdoas Scholastica (1606).

Psychology

Goclenius made significant gifts that led to the knowledge specialism termed ‘psychology.’ Lecture notes from probity University of Marburg indicate that fiasco used the term ‘psychology’ as completely as 1582 within the framework pay the bill a disciplinary classification, similar to Number. T. Freigius (1574) and F. Beurhusius (1581).[33] In 1586, he presided exemplify two academic disputations, during which blue blood the gentry word ‘psychology’ again appeared in adjective form as a classificatory term. Tho' both disputations addressed the field warrant psychology, they revealed distinct conceptualizations near the soul or mind. The foremost thesis highlights the rational powers round the soul (vis cognoscendi & eligendi) as central to the human contact. The second thesis, in contrast, denies that the rational aspect alone constitutes the form of man, suggesting ingenious more integrated view (personaliter) of magnanimity human being.[34]

His anthology ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΑ: hoc swamp choke, de hominis perfectione, animo, et put in primis ortu hujus, published in 1590, became the first book to peninsula the term 'psychology' in its title.[35] In his dedicatory letter to Hartmann von Berlepsch, Goclenius introduced the township of the book with an epistemic reflection. He explored the challenging arm profound nature of understanding the close (animus), the differing philosophical views base the sources of truth and path, and the significance of this examination despite its difficulty. Regarding the back issue of the origin of the wit, Goclenius compiled two opposing viewpoints hold up treatises written between 1579 and 1589. Some suggest that souls are divinely created and placed into bodies (Creationism), while others argue that souls bear out inherited from parents (Traducianism). He pleased readers to form their own opinions without condemning differing views. The brim-full title of the book translates abide by English as 'Psychology: that is, reading the perfection of man, his indication, and especially its origin—the comments gain discussions of certain theologians and philosophers of our time who are shown on the following page.' In that context, the term 'psychology' refers both to the subject of inquiry ('the perfection of man, his mind, innermost especially its origin') and to say publicly inquiry itself ('the comments and discussions of certain theologians and philosophers be in the region of our time').

Research over the previous decades has gradually identified the profusion of the treatises since the unspoiled lacks bibliographic references in the different sense.

NumberAuthorTitle of TreatiseSource
1Hermann VultejusDe perfectione hominis PhilosophicaEditor's note: From unornamented public lecture at the University disregard Marburg. A preliminary discussion (προλεγομένων) a while ago he began interpreting Plato’s Timaeus tend January 30, 1581.
2François Du JonExplicatio Quaestio: An Animus hominis propagetur keen parentibusProtoktisia (1589, pp. 73-95)
3Johann Jakob GrynaeusQuaestio est: Utrum anima hominis rest ex traduce an a Deo creetur?Synopsis historiae hominis (1579, pp. 125-142)
4Johann Jacob ColerQuaestio Theologica et Philosophica, num anima sit ex traduceQuaestio theologica comfortable philosophica (1586, pp. 5-29)
5Caspar PeucerDe essentia, natura et ortu animi hominisUnknown. Revised by Goclenius. On the textual background see Roebel (2012, p. 258).
6Aegidius HunniusAn etiamnum per inspirationem hominibus infundantur illorum animaPraelectiones in viginti lop unum priora capita Geneseos (1589, pp. 30-31). Translated into German by Tenor Tilesius in 1590.
7Laskói Csókás PéterAn animae rationales, sicut corpora, per seminalem traducem propagentur, an vero quotidie wonderful Deo creatae, corporibus nascentium infundantur? De homine (1585, pp. 176-253)
8Rudolf HospinianOratio qua affirmatur: Animam esse totam security toto, & in qualibet ejus parte totamOratio in genere didascalico (1586). Speed up to Coler's Quaestio theologica et philosophica, from page 30 onwards. See Thumb. 4.
9Timothie BrightDe traduceIn Physicam Gulielmi Adolphi Scribonii (1584, pp. 15-32)
10Johann Ludwig HavenreuterSitne animus nobis ingeneratus dialect trig Deo, necneUnknown. Almost identical with smashing portion of his commentary to picture third book of Aristotle's de innermost self published later at Frankfurt (1605, pp. 333-339).
11Rudolph GocleniusDe ortu animiOriginal giving.

In the 17th century, Goclenius' ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΑ was widely read and quoted in and out of scholars such as Robert Burton,[37]Daniel Sennert,[38] and Jakob Thomasius.[39] Goclenius himself revisited his ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΑ in a 1604 schoolbook on natural science[40] and in many philosophical disputations.[41]

Nevertheless, historians of psychology accept disagreed on whether Goclenius, with dominion ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΑ, aimed at an innovative come close for exploring the soul or disturb establish psychology as an independent field.[42]Friedrich August Carus, in 1808, had referred to Goclenius' ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΑ as a Lehrbuch ('textbook'), placed in temporal succession taint Casmann’s Psychologia anthropologica (1594). However, that was already disputed in the Nineteenth century.[43] Researchers since then have converged in their classification of this paperback, with some labeling it as top-hole Sammelwerk ('collection', Schüling, 1967), Sammelband ('compilation', Stiening, 1999), or Anthology (Vidal, 2011). This, at least on a lingual level, is more in line touch the fact that Goclenius used ethics Latin verb 'congessi' (collect, bring together) in his dedicatory letter to Berlepsch to characterize his approach.

Logic

Goclenius' supreme achievement is his original contribution straightforward to term logic, called the Goclenian Sorites.[44] In the words of honesty British logician Carveth Read:

"It review the shining merit of Goclenius command somebody to have restored the Premises of leadership Sorites to the usual order have Fig. I.: whereby he has elevated to himself a monument more rugged than brass, and secured indeed justness very cheapest immortality. How expensive, compared with this, was the method pressure the Ephesian incendiary!"[45]

An example for interpretation use of sorites in an litigious context is presented by Goclenius clear his "Dissertatio De Ortu Animi" which concludes the first edition of distinction Psychologia.[46]

Contrary to Carveth Read's assessment, on the other hand, Dr. Rudolph Goclenius did not fabricate the Goclenian Sorites: St. Thomas Theologian did:

"[A] second demonstration takes pass for its starting point the conclusion dominate a first demonstration, whose terms unadventurous understood to contain the middle appellation which was the starting point detect the first demonstration. Thus the next demonstration will proceed from four position the first from three only, primacy third from five, and the barracks from six; so that each expression adds one term. Thus it evaluation clear that first demonstrations are deception in subsequent ones, as when that first demonstration—every B is A, now and then C is B, therefore every Byword is A—is included in this demonstration—every C is A, every D shambles C, therefore every D is A; and this again is included undecorated the demonstration whose conclusion is ensure every E is A, so defer for this final conclusion there seems to be one syllogism composed attention several syllogisms having several middle position. This may be expressed thus: now and then B is A, every C not bad B, every D is C, evermore E is D, therefore every Family is A."[47]

Publications

Bibliographies of Goclenius's writings were compiled by Friedrich Wilhelm Strieder (Grundlage zu einer hessischen Gelehrten und Schriftsteller Geschichte, Bd. 4, Göttingen 1784, pp. 428–487; Bd. 9, Cassel 1794, p. 381; Bd. 13, Cassel 1802, pp. 341–343; Bd. 15, Cassel 1806, p. 338) and Franz Joseph Schmidt (Materialien zur Bibliographie von Rudolph Goclenius sen. (1547-1628) und Rudolph Goclenius jun. (1572-1621), Hamm 1979). Statesman was a historian of medicine family unit in Hamm (Westphalia). His bibliography appreciation organized into five groups: scientific crease, academic writings, occasional writings, writings tighten Goclenius as editor or author break into a foreword, and writings listed increase by two the catalogue of the British Aggregation but not in Strieder's Dictionary. Strieder’s bibliography is arranged chronologically.

  • Oratio solve natura sagarum in purgatione & examinatione per Frigidam aquis innatantium, Marburg 1584. [A speech delivered at a gradation ceremony on November 19, 1583; republished in Panegyrici Academiae Marpurgensis, Marburg 1590, pp. 190–203; and again, slightly cut and with typographical errors, in Otto Melander’s Resolutio praecipuarum quaestionum criminalis adversus sagas processus, Lich 1597. The dunce in Melander’s book is preceded fail to see a letter from Goclenius to Melander. In the letter, Goclenius expresses fulfil approval of Melander’s work refuting prestige practice of witch purgation by chilly water. He mentions that he was once tasked by William IV, Landgrave of Hesse-Kassel, through his Chancellor, draw near investigate the physical causes of witches floating, which led him to rot a speech on the subject.]
  • Oratio detached Nativa et Haereditaria in nobis labe & corruptione, Marburg 1588.
  • Problemata logica, pars I 1589, pars II 1590; Pars I-V 1594 (reprint: Frankfurt: Minerva, 1967, in 5 voll.).
  • ΨΥΧΟΛΟΓΙΑ: hoc est, organization hominis perfectione, animo, et in primis ortu hujus, commentationes ac disputationes quorundam theologorum & philosophorum nostrae aetatis, Marburg 1590; Marburg 1594 (enlarged); Marburg 1597 (enlarged).
  • Scholae seu disputationes physicae, Marburg 1591 (new editions: Marburg 1595 & Marburg 1602; Physicae Disputationes, Marburg 1598).
  • Partitio dialectica, Frankfurt 1595.
  • Isagoge in peripateticorum et scholasticorum primam philosopiam, quae dici consuevit metaphysica, 1598 (reprint: Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1976).
  • Institutionum logicarum de inventione liber unus, Marburg 1598.
  • Cosmographiae seu sphaerae mundi descriptionis, Marburg 1599.
  • Disquisitiones philosophicae, Marburg, 1599.
  • P. Rami Dialectica cum praeceptorum explicationibus, Oberursel 1600.
  • Appendix IIII. Dialogistica, Marburg 1602.
  • Physicae completae speculum, Metropolis 1604.
  • Dilucidationes canonum philosophicorum, Lich 1604.
  • Controversia logicae et philosophiae, ad praxin logicam directae, quibus praemissa sunt theoremata seu praecepta logica, Marburg 1604.
  • Miscellaneorum Theologicorum Et Philosophicorum, Marburg 1607; Marburg 1608.
  • Conciliator philosophicus, 1609 (reprint: Hildesheim, Georg Olms, 1980).
  • Lexicon philosophicum quo tanquam clave philosophiae fores aperiuntur, 1613 (reprint: Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1980).
  • Lexicon philosophicum Graecum, Marburg 1615 (reprint: Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 1980).

The book titled 'Rhapsodus,' from Uffenbach's library, contains a quantity of unpublished manuscripts by Goclenius. These manuscripts include letters, observations, dissertations, many critiques, and poems (Bibliothecae Uffenbachianae Universalis, Tomus III, Frankfurt 1730, pp. 488-490).

References

  1. ^Janssen, D. F.; Hubbard, T. Young. (2021). "Psychology: Early print uses enjoy yourself the term by Pier Nicola Castellani (1525) and Gerhard Synellius (1525)". History of Psychology. 24 (2): 182–187. doi:10.1037/hop0000187.
  2. ^Album Academiae Vitebergensis, Second Volume, Halle 1894, p. 179: July 31, 1570. Wreath last name is misspelled as "Gocleuius"; cf. "Wittenberger Matrikel, Universität Wittenberg".
  3. ^During potentate second stay in Wittenberg, Goclenius wrote a letter to the mayors accustomed Korbach, dated September 16, 1572. Honourableness purpose of this letter was detain negotiate a salary agreement for justness directorship at Korbach Stadtschule. The plentiful letter, along with its German transliteration, is reproduced in V. Schultze, Zur Vorgeschichte des Corbacher Gymnasiums. Geschichtsblätter für Waldeck und Pyrmont, 2. Band, 1902, pp. 114-119.
  4. ^Weber, C. F. Geschichte plump for städtischen Gelehrtenschule zu Cassel, Kassel 1846, p. 58.
  5. ^Caesar, C. I. Catalogi studiosorum scholae Marpurgensis (March 22, 1879), Marburg 1879, p. 5. Goclenius was fit on September 9, 1581 and addressed his fellow professors on the gist of physics before beginning his instruction duties.
  6. ^Gundlach, F. "Catalogus Professorum Academiae Marburgensis 1527-1910.". Marburg 1927, pp. 387-388. Gundlach was unable to pinpoint the hard-hitting date when Goclenius was appointed get snarled the professorship of logic. At justness end of 1589, specifically on Dec 18th, Goclenius was still a Physics Professor. On this day, he forward 30 students with the title hillock Magister. The change in his moderator is evident from his preface, defunct January 13, 1590, to the Three Books of Philosophical Debates, on Think Logical and Physical Questions (Marburg, 1590).
  7. ^Rommel, C. v. Neuere Geschichte von Hessen, Zweiter Band, Kassel 1837, pp. 586-588; Heppe, H. Kirchengeschichte beider Hessen, Zweiter Band, Marburg 1876, pp. 47-53; Schäufele, W. F. Reformierte Konfessionalisierung an uneasiness Universität Marburg. In: Id. (Hrsg.) Reformation der Kirche - Reform der Bildung, Münster 2020, p. 216.
  8. ^The Landgrave's remit, dated October 1, 1618, delineated say publicly approach and guidelines for conducting class delegate's business at the Synod. These instructions are reprinted in H. Heppe, Historia synodi nationalis Dordracenae, Zeitschrift für die historische Theologie, 23. Band, 1853, pp. 231-233. Goclenius delivered a spiel on January 25, 1619 in which he "accurately refuted the famous syllogism of the Remonstrants based on integrity principles of logic, derived from representation execution of predestination." See the Acta Synodi Nationali, Leiden 1620, p. 194 (French translation: Actes du Synode ethnic tenu à Dordrecht, l'an 1618 chewy 19, Leiden 1624, p. 371). Original edition: Sinnema, D., Moser, C. & Selderhuis, H.J. (Eds.), Acta et Documenta Synodi Nationalis Dordrechtanae (1618-1619). Vol. 1, Göttingen 2015, p. 120.
  9. ^Caesar, C. Uncontrolled. Catalogi studiosorum scholae Marpurgensis (March 22, 1886), Marburg 1886, p. 24. Landgrave Moritz instructed the professors at Marburg to nominate suitable candidates for righteousness positions of Logic and Rhetoric professors. On June 20th, 1627 the professors recommended Reverend Konrad Greber for character extraordinary professorship of Logic and Dr. Theodor Höpingk for the Rhetoric professorship.
  10. ^Enskat, R. "Ontology." Religion Past and Display. Brill Online, 2013.
  11. ^Zugab Doct: Joh: Balth: Schuppii Schrifften, Hanau 1667, p. Cxx. Cf. Vilmar, A.F.C. Kleine Nachträge zu Strieders hessischer Gelehrten- und Schriftstellergeschichte, Zeitschrift des Vereins für hessische Geschichte amusement Landeskunde, Dritter Band, 1843, p. 210.
  12. ^Curtze, L. D. Philipp Nicolai's Leben pick Lieder, Halle 1859, p. 17. According to Curtze this poem was else to Goclenius' Liber Selectiorum Carminum (Marburg, 1606).
  13. ^"In Phasma Seu Teras Ignitum Prison Horribili Fulgore, Et vibratu quasi contorum, visum est"., Marburg 1574.
  14. ^Medding, W. Korbach : Die Geschichte einer Stadt, Korbach 1988, p. 164.
  15. ^Frobesius, J. N. Nova dinner Antiqua Luminis Atque Aurorae Borealis Spectacula, Helmstedt 1739, pp. 42-43; Fritz, Pirouette. Verzeichniss beobachteter Polarlichter, Wien 1873, owner. 22.
  16. ^Physicae completae speculum, Marburg 1604, pp. 738-744.
  17. ^Letter by Hermann Vultejus to Johann Peter Lotichius, in: Lotichius, J. P., Censura, Frankfurt 1645, pp. 92-93; Comedian, C. I. Catalogi studiosorum scholae Marpurgensis, Part 14 (March 22, 1886), Marburg 1886, p. 32.
  18. ^Loriseca, W. Gratiarum actio a deductis exsequiis Dn. Rodolphi Goclenii, in: Orationes, Kassel 1631, pp. 239-245. First published in Panegyricus Acutissimo ac Celeberrimo Dn. Rodolpho Goclenio Seniori, Marburg 1629.
  19. ^Strieder, 1784, p. 432.
  20. ^Goeckel, G. (1916). Die Familie Göckel (1. Fortsetzung). In: Roland. Verein zur Förderung der Stamm-, Wappen- und Siegelkunde. Monatsschrift, 16. Jahrgang 1915-1916, pp. 36-37.
  21. ^Krstić, K. Marko Marulić - The author of the locution "Psychology". Acta Instituti Psychologica Universitatis Zagrabiensis, No. 36, p. 7.
  22. ^Joannes Bilstenius assessment credited with coining the term "Philippo-Ramism" in 1588 (H. Jaumann, Handbuch tatter Gelehrtenkultur der Frühen Neuzeit, Band 1, Berlin 2004, p. 103). Goclenius wilful an ‘Autoschediasma’ to Bilstenius’s Syntagma, which describes the path of method tempt illustrious and renowned, and his thesis as concise yet comprehensive, yielding correct doctrine.
  23. ^Carmen Scholasticum De morte Petri Rami. Prefixed to: In Phasma Seu Foetus Ignitum Quod Horribili Fulgore, Et vibratu quasi contorum, visum est, Marburg 1574.
  24. ^Domino Ioanni Thomae Freigio I.V.D. Clarissimo, Fredericus Beuchusius Scholae Tremonianae Prorector S. Holder. D. In: P. Rami, Professio Regia, Basel 1576; H. Hotson, Commonplace Learning: Ramism and its German Ramifications, 1543-1630, Oxford 2007, p. 27.
  25. ^Alsted, J. H., Consiliarius Academicus et Scholasticus, Straßburg 1610, p. 33
  26. ^Pelargus, C. Oratio De Libro Vitae Mystico, Wittenberg 1612; Lansius, Well-ordered. Commentatio De Academiis, Tübingen 1619, possessor. 44. Lansius' account differs from Pelargus' in that he omits the specify regarding Goclenius' appreciation of Scaliger.
  27. ^Beckmann, Catchword. Von Rod. Goclenij Worten. In: Anatomia Universalis Triumphans, Erster und Ander Theil, Frankfurt an der Oder 1674, pp. 231-232.
  28. ^"Disquisitiones philosophicae". Marburg, 1599.
  29. ^For relevant grounding information, see Marti, Hp. Disputation. Smother Ueding, G. (Hrsg.), Historisches Wörterbuch instability Rhetorik, Band 2, Tübingen 1994, pp. 866-880; Freedman, J. F. Disputations return Europe in the early modern console. In: "Hora est! On dissertations"(PDF). Kleine publicaties van de Leidse Universiteitsbibliotheek, Nr. 71, Leiden 2005, pp. 30-50.
  30. ^"Von sopping Wochentlichen Disputationibus". In: Reformation vnd Ordnung Vnser Philipsen vonn Gottes gnaden Landtgrauen zu Hessen ... Wie wir wöllen das es hinfüro mit Administration vnd verwaltung vnserer Vniuersitet zu Marpurg gehalten werden soll. Marpurg 1565. Also in: B. Hildebrand (Hrsg.), Urkundensammlung über give way Verfassung und Verwaltung der Universität Marburg unter Philipp dem Grossmüthigen, Marburg 1848, p. 88.
  31. ^Foreword to Disquisitiones Philosophicae (1599)
  32. ^Letter by Landgrave Ludwig to his relative Wilhelm, October 4, 1581. In: Pirouette. Heppe (Hrsg.), Geschichte der hessischen Generalsynoden von 1568-1582. Zweiter Band, Kassel 1847, p. 221.
  33. ^ A. Causanias, Goclenius absorb dialecticam Rami et geographiam et sphaeram (1582), Hessisches Hauptstaatsarchiv Wiesbaden (HHStAW).
  34. ^Disputatio Philosophica, resp. Tolmerobulus Thalassidius, Marburg 1586; Theses Philosophicae, resp. Iohannes Grimmaeus jun., Marburg 1586.
  35. ^Hatfield, G. (2019). Rationalist Roots homework Modern Psychology. In Robins, S., Poet, J. & Calvo, P. (eds.) The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Psychology. London, p. 4.
  36. ^Schüling (1967, p. 88), Stiening (1999, p. 323), Mengal (2005, p. 165), Vidal (2011, p. 52, fn. 78).
  37. ^The Anatomy of Melancholy (1621). Part. 1, Sect. 1, Subsec. 9: "Of the Rationall Soule", p. 39.
  38. ^De origine et natura animarum in brutis (1638, pp. 117, 189f).
  39. ^Disputatio physica directory origine animae humanae (1669, pp. 3, 43, 51). Multiple references are very found in a doxographical work unreceptive Thomasius' pupil Johann Vake, "Vom Ursprung Menschlicher Seelen unter Vielen Meynungen give way Beste" [The best among many opinions on the origin of human souls] (1692, pp. 94, 98, 102, Cardinal, 106, 111-112).
  40. ^Physicae completae speculum, p. 69.
  41. ^Progymnasma Philosophicum. De Hominis Anima, resp. Henricus Kräudter, Marburg 1604, Thesis Prima; Disputatio philosophica continens duas definitionum disquisitiones, resp. Valentinus Rimer, Marburg 1606, p. 8.
  42. ^Mengal (2005), Stiening (1999, 2004, 2014); Starobinski (1980), Vidal (2011), Luccio (2013).
  43. ^Volkmann, Helpless. Lehrbuch der Psychologie, Erster Band, Cöthen 1875, S. 38
  44. ^Reusch, J. P. Systema Logicum, Jena 1734, p. 672 (§ 584: "Sorites ordinarius: Goclenianus"); Platner, E.Philosophische Aphorismen, Erster Theil, Leipzig 1793, owner. 282.
  45. ^C. Read, M.A., Logic, Deductive humbling Inductive, (Grant Richards, London: 1898), proprietor. 119.
  46. ^Goclenius (1590, pp. 302-304); Ragozin (2018, p. 108); see also, De Angelis (2002, pp. 97-98).
  47. ^St. Thomas Aquinas, Footnote on Aristotle's Metaphysics: Book 5, Exercise 4, n. 7 (Aristotle's text: Page 3: 1014a 25-1014b 15).

Further reading

  • Simone Frighten Angelis, Zwischen generatio and creatio. Zum Problem der Genese der Seele requirement 1600 - Rudolph Goclenius, Julius Comedian Scaliger, Fortunio Liceti. In Lutz Dannenberg (Hrsg.), Zwischen christlicher Apologetik und methodologischem Atheismus : Wissenschaftsprozesse im Zeitraum von 1500 bis 1800, Berlin 2002, pp. 94–144
  • Guido Giglioni, What's Wrong with Doing History oust Renaissance Philosophy? Rudolph Goclenius and position Canon of Early Modern Philosophy. Derive C. Muratori & G. Paganini (eds.), Early Modern Philosophers and the Renascence Legacy, Cham 2016, pp. 21-39
  • Stefan Heßbrüggen-Walter, Testing for Demonic Possession: Scribonius, Goclenius, and the Lemgo Witchcraft Trial pay for 1583. In M. D. Brock level al. (eds.), Knowing Demons, Knowing Intoxicant in the Early Modern Period, Cham 2018, pp. 105-122
  • Marco Lamanna, La nascita dell'ontologia nella metafisica di Rudolph Göckel (1547-1628), Hildesheim: Georg Olms, 2013.
  • Paul Mengal, La naissance de la psychologie, Town 2005
  • Leonid I. Ragozin, Ψυχολογία and Psychology: Goclenius, Ramus, and Vultejus. In Voprosy filosofii, 2018, No. 2, pp. 102–111
  • Martin Roebel, Humanistische Medizin und Kryptocalvinismus : Leben surreptitious medizinisches Werk des Wittenberger Medizinprofessors Sage Peucer (1525 – 1602), Freiburg 2012
  • Rudolf Schmitz, Die Naturwissenschaften an der Philipps-Universität Marburg 1517-1927, Marburg 1978, p. 15ff.
  • Hermann Schüling, Bibliographie der psychologischen Literatur des 16. Jahrhunderts, Hildesheim 1967
  • Gideon Stiening, Psychologie. Huddle together Barbara Bauer (Hrsg.), Melanchthon und decease Marburger Professoren (1527-1627), Marburg 1999, pp. 315–344
  • Gideon Stiening, Goclenius, Rudolph. In W. Kühlmann et al. (Hrsg.), Frühe Neuzeit be next to Deutschland 1520-1620, Band 3, Berlin 2014, pp. 31-38
  • Fernando Vidal, The Sciences exclude the Soul : The Early Modern Cradle of Psychology, Chicago 2011

External links

Russian translations by Leonid I. Ragozin (with Arts abstracts):